Brooklyn, New York is home to 318 Medicaid providers billing code T1019 — "personal care services per 15 minutes." Together, they've billed $31.8 billion between 2018 and 2024. That's more than the total Medicaid provider spending of 40 individual states.
The next closest city for T1019 billing is Manhattan at $7.5 billion — less than a quarter of Brooklyn's total. After that, the numbers drop fast: Stoughton, MA ($6.0B from just 5 providers), Flushing, NY ($4.0B), and the Bronx ($3.5B).
The Top Brooklyn T1019 Billers
Here are the 20 highest-billing T1019 providers in Brooklyn:
| # | Provider | Total Paid | Beneficiaries | Codes Billed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AssistCareHome Healthcare Services | $1.44B | 461,789 | 17 |
| 2 | NAE Edison LLC | $1.11B | 328,024 | 10 |
| 3 | Heart to Heart Home Care, Inc. | $1.10B | 377,858 | 9 |
| 4 | Platinum Home Health Care Inc. | $865M | 241,832 | 6 |
| 5 | Home Family Care, Inc | $842M | 250,306 | 6 |
| 6 | Human Care LLC | $840M | 227,232 | 7 |
| 7 | A & J Staffing, Inc | $775M | 264,684 | 4 |
| 8 | All American Homecare Agency Inc. | $759M | 231,057 | 4 |
| 9 | S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. | $767M | 202,920 | 7 |
| 10 | Special Touch Home Care Services, Inc. | $745M | 194,048 | 6 |
| 11 | Five Star Home Health Care Agency | $740M | 196,653 | 7 |
| 12 | The Royal Care Inc | $737M | 192,845 | 4 |
| 13 | Americare, Inc. | $686M | 177,738 | 10 |
| 14 | Astra Home Care | $609M | 189,602 | 6 |
| 15 | Home Health Care Services of NY | $588M | 131,659 | 5 |
| 16 | Attentive Home Care Agency Inc | $536M | 147,494 | 5 |
| 17 | Community Home Care Referral Service, Inc. | $528M | 141,994 | 5 |
| 18 | People Care Incorporated | $521M | 134,705 | 7 |
| 19 | The Doral Investors Group / House Calls Home Care | $497M | 145,305 | 6 |
| 20 | S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. | $461M | 141,887 | 4 |
A Pattern of Concentration
What stands out isn't the spending alone — it's the structure. Most of these providers bill only 4 to 7 total HCPCS codes, with 88% to 99% of their revenue from the single code T1019. They have generic, interchangeable names. Several share addresses or operate from the same small area. And there are hundreds of them.
This is the pattern that the HHS DOGE Medicaid dataset was released to expose. The Minnesota autism diagnosis fraud scheme — where providers systematically billed for fabricated therapies through shell companies — is the cited precedent. Brooklyn's personal care cluster matches the profile: entity proliferation with similar names and billing patterns concentrated in one geography.
To be clear: personal care services are a legitimate and necessary part of Medicaid. Many of these providers serve real patients with real needs. New York's Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP) has driven enormous growth in home care billing. But the sheer concentration — $31.8 billion from one borough, mostly through one billing code — warrants scrutiny.
T1019 Nationally
Brooklyn isn't the only place with heavy T1019 billing. Nationally, T1019 is the single most expensive billing code in the entire Medicaid system at $122.7 billion — more than double the #2 code. But the geographic concentration tells the story:
| City | State | T1019 Providers | T1019 Spending |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brooklyn | NY | 318 | $31.8B |
| New York | NY | 61 | $7.5B |
| Stoughton, MA | MA | 5 | $6.0B |
| Flushing | NY | 31 | $4.0B |
| Bronx | NY | 54 | $3.5B |
| Forest Hills | NY | 17 | $3.1B |
| Latham | NY | 1 | $2.7B |
| Saint Louis | MO | 435 | $1.8B |
| Rego Park | NY | 10 | $1.5B |
| Washington | DC | 28 | $1.3B |
The NYC metro area — Brooklyn, Manhattan, Flushing, Bronx, Forest Hills, Latham, Rego Park — accounts for roughly $55 billion of the $122.7 billion national total for this single code. That's 45% of all personal care spending in the country, flowing through one metropolitan area.
What This Data Shows (and Doesn't)
This dataset shows billing totals — who billed what, how much, and where. It does not show whether services were actually provided, whether patients actually needed them, or whether the billed amounts were reasonable. Those are questions for auditors, investigators, and the providers themselves.
What the data does show is a pattern that, historically, correlates with fraud risk: high concentration of billing in a single code, entity proliferation with generic names, and geographic clustering. Whether any individual provider is committing fraud is not something this data can determine. But the pattern is there for anyone to examine.
You can explore all Brooklyn Medicaid providers at medicaidspending.org/state/NY/BROOKLYN, or browse the national T1019 data at medicaidspending.org/code/T1019.