NP / PA
Rottler, Karen
Rottler, Karen was paid $87K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and May 2019, across 12 billing codes. Its largest line is 99401, — 32% of everything it billed.
33Billing provider infoROTTLER, KAREN
MANCHESTER, MO 63088
MANCHESTER, MO 63088
33aNPI1043517253assigned 02/24/2011
33bProvider typeWomen's Health Nurse Practitioner
28Total paid$87K
24GClaims3,311
24DCodes billed12
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – May 2019
Compared with peers
Next to other Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers in Missouri
Rank by total paid#5 of 53
Median peer was paid$12K
This provider vs. median7.1×
Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.
Box 24A · Dates of service
Paid by month
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
| Year | Claims | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1,759 | $48K | |
| 2019 | 1,552 | $39K |
Box 24 · Service lines
What it billed for
| Code | Service | Share | Claims | Bene. records | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99401 | 32% | 1,036 | 803 | $28K | |
| J1050 | Injection, medroxyprogesterone acetate, 1 mg | 20% | 439 | 312 | $18K |
| 76817 | Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, transvaginal | 17% | 215 | 193 | $15K |
| 76830 | Ultrasound, transvaginal | 15% | 189 | 173 | $13K |
| 87806 | 6.3% | 291 | 254 | $6K | |
| 96372 | Therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic injection; subcutaneous or intramuscular | 4.9% | 439 | 308 | $4K |
| 99214 | Doctor's office visit, returning patient (more involved)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, moderate complexity | 1.7% | 58 | 52 | $1K |
| 81025 | <1% | 262 | 181 | $644.16 | |
| 87210 | <1% | 86 | 77 | $381.87 | |
| 83986 | <1% | 102 | 89 | $331.45 | |
| 86901 | <1% | 69 | 64 | $319.60 | |
| 85018 | <1% | 125 | 106 | $283.04 |
Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.