Physician
Jackson, Mark
Jackson, Mark was paid $758.26 by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Nov 2024, across 6 billing codes. Its largest line is 71045, Radiologic examination, chest; single view — 37% of everything it billed.
33Billing provider infoJACKSON, MARK
OSWEGO, NY 13126
OSWEGO, NY 13126
33aNPI1063405538assigned 08/30/2005
33bProvider typeDiagnostic Radiology Physician
28Total paid$758.26
24GClaims354
24DCodes billed6
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Nov 2024
Compared with peers
Next to other Diagnostic Radiology Physician providers in New York
Rank by total paid#1,244 of 1,568
Median peer was paid$5K
This provider vs. median0.1×
Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.
Box 24A · Dates of service
Paid by month
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
| Year | Claims | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 43 | $69.87 | |
| 2020 | 61 | $210.35 | |
| 2021 | 17 | $7.89 | |
| 2022 | 28 | $40.57 | |
| 2023 | 58 | $102.50 | |
| 2024incomplete | 147 | $327.08 |
Box 24 · Service lines
What it billed for
| Code | Service | Share | Claims | Bene. records | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71045 | Radiologic examination, chest; single view | 37% | 157 | 150 | $280.85 |
| 71046 | Radiologic examination, chest; 2 views | 29% | 41 | 40 | $222.50 |
| 77067 | Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection | 20% | 54 | 54 | $153.68 |
| 77063 | Screening digital breast tomosynthesis, bilateral | 13% | 53 | 53 | $101.23 |
| G9551 | Final reports for imaging studies without an incidentally found lesion noted | 0% | 15 | 14 | $0.00 |
| G9637 | Final reports with documentation of one or more dose reduction techniques (e.g., automated exposure control, adjustment of the ma and/or kv according to patient size, use of iterative reconstruction technique) | 0% | 34 | 27 | $0.00 |
Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.