Physician
Shaw, Albert
Shaw, Albert was paid $8K by Medicaid between Apr 2021 and Dec 2024, across 11 billing codes. Its largest line is 71046, Radiologic examination, chest; 2 views — 31% of everything it billed.
33Billing provider infoSHAW, ALBERT
POLAND, OH 44514
POLAND, OH 44514
33aNPI1225127954assigned 10/12/2006
33bProvider typeDiagnostic Radiology Physician
28Total paid$8K
24GClaims698
24DCodes billed11
24AFirst – last monthApr 2021 – Dec 2024
Compared with peers
Next to other Diagnostic Radiology Physician providers in Ohio
Rank by total paid#87 of 188
Median peer was paid$6K
This provider vs. median1.4×
Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.
Box 24A · Dates of service
Paid by month
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
| Year | Claims | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54 | $746.70 | |
| 2023 | 276 | $5K | |
| 2024incomplete | 368 | $3K |
Box 24 · Service lines
What it billed for
| Code | Service | Share | Claims | Bene. records | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71046 | Radiologic examination, chest; 2 views | 31% | 335 | 333 | $3K |
| 71045 | Radiologic examination, chest; single view | 14% | 186 | 182 | $1K |
| 76642 | 14% | 41 | 41 | $1K | |
| 74177 | Computed tomography, abdomen and pelvis; with contrast material | 11% | 15 | 15 | $950.29 |
| 77067 | Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection | 7.0% | 19 | 19 | $587.70 |
| 70450 | Computed tomography, head or brain; without contrast material | 6.3% | 16 | 16 | $533.70 |
| 77063 | Screening digital breast tomosynthesis, bilateral | 5.6% | 19 | 19 | $474.84 |
| 76815 | Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, limited | 5.6% | 17 | 15 | $467.50 |
| 72110 | 2.2% | 13 | 13 | $188.77 | |
| 74018 | 2.1% | 23 | 23 | $178.42 | |
| 73630 | 1.4% | 14 | 13 | $114.45 |
Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.