Steinkeler, Jennifer

Steinkeler, Jennifer was paid $31K by Medicaid between Sep 2018 and Dec 2022, across 11 billing codes. Its largest line is 77067, Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection — 48% of everything it billed.

33Billing provider infoSTEINKELER, JENNIFER
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139

33aNPI1326301235assigned 06/18/2012

33bProvider typeDiagnostic Radiology Physician

28Total paid$31K

24GClaims1,097

24DCodes billed11

24AFirst – last monthSep 2018 – Dec 2022

Compared with peers

Next to other Diagnostic Radiology Physician providers in Massachusetts

Rank by total paid#82 of 427

Median peer was paid$3K

This provider vs. median10×

Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.

Box 24A · Dates of service

Paid by month

Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider

By year, as a table

Year	Claims	Paid
2018	185	$5K
2019	428	$11K
2020	52	$2K
2021	190	$6K
2022	242	$7K

Box 24 · Service lines

What it billed for

Code	Service	Share	Claims	Bene. records	Paid
77067	Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection	48%	347	347	$15K
77063	Screening digital breast tomosynthesis, bilateral	26%	346	346	$8K
71046	Radiologic examination, chest; 2 views	4.7%	168	168	$1K
76816	Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, follow-up	4.3%	40	39	$1K
93975		4.1%	28	28	$1K
76642		3.8%	43	40	$1K
76815	Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, limited	3.2%	43	43	$978.16
74177	Computed tomography, abdomen and pelvis; with contrast material	3.0%	13	13	$912.47
76817	Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, transvaginal	1.5%	15	15	$445.05
76376		<1%	37	37	$274.32
G1004	Clinical decision support mechanism national decision support company, as defined by the medicare appropriate use criteria program	0%	17	17	$0.00

Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.