Physician
Setlur, Vikram
Setlur, Vikram was paid $220K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Nov 2024, across 7 billing codes. Its largest line is 67028, Intravitreal injection of a pharmacologic agent — 60% of everything it billed.
33Billing provider infoSETLUR, VIKRAM
WHEATON, IL 60187
WHEATON, IL 60187
33aNPI1750547733assigned 07/30/2008
33bProvider typeOphthalmology Physician
28Total paid$220K
24GClaims5,123
24DCodes billed7
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Nov 2024
Compared with peers
Next to other Ophthalmology Physician providers in Illinois
Rank by total paid#102 of 431
Median peer was paid$34K
This provider vs. median6.4×
Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.
Box 24A · Dates of service
Paid by month
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
| Year | Claims | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 438 | $16K | |
| 2019 | 897 | $49K | |
| 2020 | 779 | $28K | |
| 2021 | 823 | $30K | |
| 2022 | 995 | $48K | |
| 2023 | 745 | $32K | |
| 2024incomplete | 446 | $17K |
Box 24 · Service lines
What it billed for
| Code | Service | Share | Claims | Bene. records | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67028 | Intravitreal injection of a pharmacologic agent | 60% | 922 | 707 | $133K |
| 92134 | 13% | 2,039 | 1,836 | $28K | |
| J9035 | Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg | 12% | 578 | 438 | $26K |
| 92014 | Ophthalmological services: medical examination and evaluation, comprehensive, established patient | 8.1% | 618 | 555 | $18K |
| 92012 | Ophthalmological services: medical examination and evaluation, intermediate, established patient | 5.2% | 824 | 716 | $11K |
| 99214 | Doctor's office visit, returning patient (more involved)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, moderate complexity | 1.9% | 113 | 108 | $4K |
| 92201 | <1% | 29 | 29 | $297.27 |
Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.