Medicaid Provider SpendingClaims paid 2018–2024 · HHS public file
Home › AZ › Tucson › NPI 1831196427
Physician

Sato, Sam

Sato, Sam was paid $990K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Jul 2021, across 9 billing codes. Its largest line is 92060, — 32% of everything it billed.

33Billing provider infoSATO, SAM
TUCSON, AZ 85719
33aNPI1831196427assigned 06/28/2005
33bProvider typeOphthalmology Physician
28Total paid$990K
24GClaims21,265
24DCodes billed9
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Jul 2021
Compared with peers

Next to other Ophthalmology Physician providers in Arizona

Rank by total paid#12 of 78
Median peer was paid$44K
This provider vs. median23×

Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.

Box 24A · Dates of service

Paid by month

$0$25K$50K$75K2018201920202021202220232024
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
YearClaimsPaid
201810,522$466K
201910,679$521K
202164$4K
Box 24 · Service lines

What it billed for

CodeServiceShareClaimsBene. recordsPaid
92060 32% 7,329 7,011 $318K
99214 Doctor's office visit, returning patient (more involved)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, moderate complexity 23% 3,523 3,377 $229K
99204 Doctor's office visit, new patient (more involved)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient, moderate complexity 17% 1,634 1,583 $170K
92015 Determination of refractive state 13% 5,368 5,140 $130K
99213 Doctor's office visit, returning patient (routine)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, low complexity 12% 2,743 2,552 $123K
92285 <1% 462 437 $10K
92250 <1% 179 172 $9K
92014 Ophthalmological services: medical examination and evaluation, comprehensive, established patient <1% 12 12 $1K
92226 <1% 15 13 $182.90

Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.