Medicaid Provider SpendingClaims paid 2018–2024 · HHS public file
Home › MO › Springfield › NPI 1841558921
Physician

Archer, Rachel

Archer, Rachel was paid $373K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Jul 2020, across 10 billing codes. Its largest line is 99213, doctor's office visit, returning patient (routine) — 60% of everything it billed.

33Billing provider infoARCHER, RACHEL
SPRINGFIELD, MO 65802
33aNPI1841558921assigned 04/26/2012
28Total paid$373K
24GClaims3,639
24DCodes billed10
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Jul 2020
Compared with peers

Next to other Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician providers in Missouri

Rank by total paid#24 of 358
Median peer was paid$16K
This provider vs. median24×

Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.

Box 24A · Dates of service

Paid by month

$0$10K$20K$30K2018201920202021202220232024
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
YearClaimsPaid
20181,812$183K
20191,531$162K
2020296$28K
Box 24 · Service lines

What it billed for

CodeServiceShareClaimsBene. recordsPaid
99213 Doctor's office visit, returning patient (routine)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, low complexity 60% 2,297 1,580 $224K
76816 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, follow-up 12% 236 217 $46K
80307 Drug test(s), presumptive, any number of drug classes; immunoassay 12% 508 389 $45K
59430 4.3% 61 60 $16K
59025 Fetal non-stress test 3.3% 110 66 $13K
76805 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, fetal and maternal evaluation 3.1% 43 43 $12K
80306 2.3% 103 80 $8K
85025 Blood count; complete (CBC), automated, and automated differential WBC count 1.4% 171 166 $5K
76815 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, limited <1% 14 12 $2K
82950 <1% 96 95 $2K

Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.