Medicaid Provider SpendingClaims paid 2018–2024 · HHS public file
Home › CA › Alhambra › NPI 1982646022

Yang, Chieh-Jen

Yang, Chieh-Jen was paid $125K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Jan 2022, across 11 billing codes. Its largest line is 77067, Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection — 47% of everything it billed.

33Billing provider infoYANG, CHIEH-JEN
ALHAMBRA, CA 91801
33aNPI1982646022assigned 06/12/2006
33bProvider typeSpecialist
28Total paid$125K
24GClaims4,628
24DCodes billed11
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Jan 2022
Compared with peers

Next to other Specialist providers in California

Rank by total paid#502 of 1,230
Median peer was paid$51K
This provider vs. median2.4×

Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.

Box 24A · Dates of service

Paid by month

$0$2.0K$4.0K$6.0K2018201920202021202220232024
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
YearClaimsPaid
20181,490$26K
20191,268$37K
2020702$23K
20211,125$37K
202243$2K
Box 24 · Service lines

What it billed for

CodeServiceShareClaimsBene. recordsPaid
77067 Screening mammography, bilateral, including computer-aided detection 47% 1,551 1,549 $59K
76700 Ultrasound, abdominal, real time with image documentation; complete 28% 1,296 1,295 $35K
76856 Ultrasound, pelvic (nonobstetric), real time with image documentation; complete 10% 398 398 $12K
76641 7.4% 322 279 $9K
71046 Radiologic examination, chest; 2 views 5.7% 730 727 $7K
77080 <1% 95 95 $839.31
76536 <1% 27 27 $538.57
76770 <1% 12 12 $399.55
73562 <1% 19 15 $231.53
76830 Ultrasound, transvaginal <1% 164 164 $101.24
G9637 Final reports with documentation of one or more dose reduction techniques (e.g., automated exposure control, adjustment of the ma and/or kv according to patient size, use of iterative reconstruction technique) 0% 14 14 $0.00

Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.