Mehta, Anil
Mehta, Anil was paid $137K by Medicaid between Jan 2018 and Aug 2019, across 10 billing codes. Its largest line is 43239, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, flexible, transoral; with biopsy, single or multiple — 74% of everything it billed.
33Billing provider infoMEHTA, ANIL
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
33aNPI1992718852assigned 08/14/2006
33bProvider typeSpecialist
28Total paid$137K
24GClaims1,467
24DCodes billed10
24AFirst – last monthJan 2018 – Aug 2019
Compared with peers
Next to other Specialist providers in California
Rank by total paid#477 of 1,230
Median peer was paid$51K
This provider vs. median2.7×
Peers share this provider's primary NPPES type and state. Size alone says nothing about billing quality: a big agency or a hospital system is expected to sit far above the median.
Box 24A · Dates of service
Paid by month
Paid that monthNov–Dec 2024: claims still arriving when the file was cut, so these months run low for every provider
By year, as a table
| Year | Claims | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 401 | $73K | |
| 2019 | 1,066 | $65K |
Box 24 · Service lines
What it billed for
| Code | Service | Share | Claims | Bene. records | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43239 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, flexible, transoral; with biopsy, single or multiple | 74% | 426 | 407 | $101K |
| 45378 | Colonoscopy, flexible; diagnostic, including collection of specimen(s) | 9.5% | 36 | 36 | $13K |
| 99213 | Doctor's office visit, returning patient (routine)Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, low complexity | 4.5% | 178 | 170 | $6K |
| 83013 | 4.0% | 105 | 90 | $6K | |
| 43450 | 3.0% | 123 | 118 | $4K | |
| 99243 | 2.5% | 63 | 61 | $3K | |
| 99212 | Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, straightforward | 1.2% | 75 | 75 | $2K |
| 85018 | <1% | 187 | 166 | $1K | |
| 83014 | <1% | 100 | 87 | $636.06 | |
| 36415 | Collection of venous blood by venipuncture | <1% | 174 | 166 | $240.31 |
Claims and beneficiary counts add up across code × month rows, so one patient seen every month counts many times. Rows with fewer than 12 claims are suppressed by HHS, so small lines can be missing.